Monday, October 10, 2005
These Lying Times...What CONstitutional Government is This?
....taking a look at the con in the constitution
by Carl G Loy
10/09/05
The Constitution is man-made and made by man to deceive. We can deny all we want, but the fact is that the Constitution was formed by those who wanted to protect their own assets as well as lay the groundwork for a New World Order. That in order to protect themselves, they the Formers, had to appear to protect the lowliest of us all is little debatable. That the founding of America is an inspired work of God may be debatable for it was to Lucifer that God gave the world as we know it and that is not debatable, if one accepts Scripture as His Truth. I once believed that America was founded by the inspired Will of God as a Christian nation, but I was wrong. That thinking does not seem compatible with His True Word. That His Will over rules all else is not in question and what He allows is at His sole discretion. God was much a part of the minds and attitudes of many of the early colonists who were seeking more religious freedom, but what they first did was set up religious colonies denying others to worship differently. Many criminals and vigrants were a part of these early settlers, some legally released from prison based upon their agreeing to come to America. Some came to escape personal situations and otherwise bleak futures.
However, it was the aristocrats who were mostly of wealth and serving the king and freemasonry who laid the ground work for a New World, an American New World Order. The struggle to accomplish the finished work of a new 'Order' has never ceased from the time of our founding. The fact that there were many who worshiped God and who yearned for freedom did not dispell the tendency they had to force others to accept their beliefs and practices. For that reason, many left various settlements to strike out into frontier areas in search of liberty and a new life. If not for the tyrannical nature of many of the colonies, the exploration and settling toward the west would not have so fast materialized.
The aristocrats well knew that they would never bring to fulfillment a New World Order as long as the colonies were independent and centering their worship of God in their own ways, ways that varied between settlements. Generally, these colonists, such as the Quakers and various other groups were content to reside and work in their own communities worshiping as they deemed appropriate. The challenge to the aristrocrats was in laying out a means of uniting these adverse groups. At the same time, they were themselves well-connected and landowners of some wealth. The Articles of Confederation were the first attempt on their part to unite the colonists but that still maintained the independent nature of each colony or by now a group of informal states and that would never bring about a centralized government that could establish a New World Order. To accomplish this, a group of aristrocrats enticed some others because of their positions of influence to join with them to form a new government based upon a constitution that would offer something for everyone, protecting the rights of the individual and the varied religions, protecting property rights, etc., but which had far more sinister purposes. The aristrocrats told the public that they were meeting to revise and make better the Articles of Confederation, an outright lie. The meeting was held in secret and no press allowed. Patrick Henry said he "smelled a rat." The Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation were adequate for the purposes intended and no constitution establishing a more centralized government such as the federal goverment we have today, was necessary, except for the purposes of these aristocrats to establish the basis for a New World Order and to better protect their own assets from foreign aggression. We tend to consider the constitution as protection from intrusive government and think we are a Christian nation based upon its recognition of "inalienable rights." However, the constitution grants us nothing that was not already God-given and it does not serve for our protection, although we are deceived to think so, as it has been accepted in place of God. Those who worship not the one true God have no problem denying either or both, God and the constitution, and we see this thread throughout American history.
The Founding Fathers were not all present and the group that met were not all agreeable on the content and wording of the constitution and that disagreement came to be known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Those who were not a part of the masonic aristocrats desired less government authority, but mostly these were two factions within the Masonic brotherhood vying for personal control. The original signers of the Declaration of Independence were not all included in this meeting to devise a constitution. Afterall, this was for an altogether different purpose and many would have objected to meeting in secret in pretense in order to establish a corporate government over the several states who were satisfied with their Articles of Confederation.
The constitution is basically a religious and commercial document formed for the purposes of controlling the assets and trade activities of the people of the several states by the aristocrats, serving not the people but themselves and the banking interests and the Pope.
The constitution was necessary to consolidate the states under the control of a centralized authority, who was in turn controlled by Old World politics, religion, and money. "We the People" were the aristocrats, not the citizens of the states they sought to control. "A more perfect union" was nothing more than the perfecting of that method of control. The constitution did nothing to insure the freedom of the several states, but in fact, made the individual states more unfree. The wording of the constitution is subject to how it is perceived and it was intended to deceive. Because of that document we now look to the Federal government for everything imagineable. If it was to insure a republican from of government for every state, what happened? There are no republican forms of government in the several states and never have been since the constitution. They all have similiar constitutions of 'pretense' intended to deceive. The militia were a state function and for the protection of the state, but were lost by the state to the control of the federal government by the constitution. The federal government can 'federalize' the state's militia anytime it so desires. The legislators in the federal government can pass into law anything at will and are protected by the constitution from accountability because it depends upon others to police their own and that depends upon who they actually serve; afterall the constitution is just a piece of paper. I know all about the checks and balances supposedly built into the framework of government according to the constitution, but does it actually work? Not in my lifetime, it hasn't. When foxes build the hen house and maintain it perpetually, the only activity in this regards is when the foxes have a falling out within their own ranks. We are still the chickens they guard and control. The constitution belongs to the foxes, not the chickens. Try introducing the constitution in a federal court. You will be informed by the judge that it is not allowed and that is because it is not yours to use. It is not for our benefit, but for theirs. We are only subject to the constitution as is determined by those to whom it belongs and we have to volunteer to come under their control, such as we do when we file a perjured tax return, accept social security, etc. Of course, today, they are more and more 'volunteering' for us and using force to keep us in the henhouse.
Masonic and occultic influences are evident throughout American history from the founding until the present day. The constitution opened the door to Catholicism and the Jesuits immediately became a major player in advancing the beginnings of a New World Order. Schools of higher learning, such as Georgetown, would be established by the Jesuits in short order. When the British had been fought, it was basically a war between the Papacy and the Church of England. The constitution granted the Papacy (Jesuits) a visible presence in the New World, whereas Catholics had been barred due to both the awareness of the colonists of the role of the Church thru the Dark Ages and the fact that America was owned by the King of England, who was no longer on good terms with the Pope. All wars are religious wars when the truth is discovered, and such was our own war with the Crown, but it was instigated by the Masonic Brotherhood.
We have a CONstitutional government of the people it serves, for the people it serves, and by the people it serves, and that is not us. When they want to use it, they do; when they want to ignore it, they do so. They do just enough to keep us deceived into thinking it applies to us in ways it does not, and unaware that it mostly applies to us as assets, or as is more commonly known today, human resources; just chickens being guarded in their hen house expected to lay their eggs in return for their handouts. It's an entire world of chickens they seek, subject to their needs of production and subject to their use and disposal in a New World Order of their making. Those who have God do not need a false constitution formed by men. In fact, the constitution competes with God for our worship and attention.
We turn to this false document of Lucifer's world for needs that God ordains and offers to us. If you are a true Believer and study His Teaching diligently as instructed, why do you need a man-made document on which to depend for your God-given rights which include true liberty and respect for the rights (love) of others? The world is ruled by the money-lenders, the same type who Jesus threw out of the temple. The constitution was instituted by men at their behest for their benefit and they have ties to Pharisee Christianity and Rome. It is not even a binding document on any citizen. It was written by lawyers and made a contract binding only the signatories of the time, which does not include us. How do you bind future generations to any document of agreement? It has to be accepted over and over, which it is, by the powers that be. It is the only justification for their existence in the eyes of the deceived. Today, much like the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, we see the factions warring among themselves to define the constitution as a 'living' document, or to re-invent it's meanings. This is just the foxes warring among themselves for the control of the chickens, us. It has nothing to do with our rights as provided by God. It has to do with which fox group gets to deny us chickens those rights. They are competing with God as AntiChrists. They compete for the control of us and for our worship, and the constitution is their tool to use in that conquest.
We do not have a 'consent of the governed' simply by our right to vote, but we are led to believe that we have a constitution that demands and protects that. I have never consented to be governed; have you? Of course, I don't vote in their system and provide them that credibility. If we are to be governed by man rather than by God, then I don't believe in a secret ballot. Why should I not know who is against me? Why should I not know who are those that choose to vote for someone that will deny my rights; who want to see my property taxed; my right to self-defense destroyed, etc, etc? If you vote, you imply approval of the system that is intent upon destroying you. You are a participant in self-destruction. Voting or not, we are all paying the way for our own demise, regardless. It doesn't get any dumber than that.
by Carl G Loy
10/09/05
The Constitution is man-made and made by man to deceive. We can deny all we want, but the fact is that the Constitution was formed by those who wanted to protect their own assets as well as lay the groundwork for a New World Order. That in order to protect themselves, they the Formers, had to appear to protect the lowliest of us all is little debatable. That the founding of America is an inspired work of God may be debatable for it was to Lucifer that God gave the world as we know it and that is not debatable, if one accepts Scripture as His Truth. I once believed that America was founded by the inspired Will of God as a Christian nation, but I was wrong. That thinking does not seem compatible with His True Word. That His Will over rules all else is not in question and what He allows is at His sole discretion. God was much a part of the minds and attitudes of many of the early colonists who were seeking more religious freedom, but what they first did was set up religious colonies denying others to worship differently. Many criminals and vigrants were a part of these early settlers, some legally released from prison based upon their agreeing to come to America. Some came to escape personal situations and otherwise bleak futures.
However, it was the aristocrats who were mostly of wealth and serving the king and freemasonry who laid the ground work for a New World, an American New World Order. The struggle to accomplish the finished work of a new 'Order' has never ceased from the time of our founding. The fact that there were many who worshiped God and who yearned for freedom did not dispell the tendency they had to force others to accept their beliefs and practices. For that reason, many left various settlements to strike out into frontier areas in search of liberty and a new life. If not for the tyrannical nature of many of the colonies, the exploration and settling toward the west would not have so fast materialized.
The aristocrats well knew that they would never bring to fulfillment a New World Order as long as the colonies were independent and centering their worship of God in their own ways, ways that varied between settlements. Generally, these colonists, such as the Quakers and various other groups were content to reside and work in their own communities worshiping as they deemed appropriate. The challenge to the aristrocrats was in laying out a means of uniting these adverse groups. At the same time, they were themselves well-connected and landowners of some wealth. The Articles of Confederation were the first attempt on their part to unite the colonists but that still maintained the independent nature of each colony or by now a group of informal states and that would never bring about a centralized government that could establish a New World Order. To accomplish this, a group of aristrocrats enticed some others because of their positions of influence to join with them to form a new government based upon a constitution that would offer something for everyone, protecting the rights of the individual and the varied religions, protecting property rights, etc., but which had far more sinister purposes. The aristrocrats told the public that they were meeting to revise and make better the Articles of Confederation, an outright lie. The meeting was held in secret and no press allowed. Patrick Henry said he "smelled a rat." The Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation were adequate for the purposes intended and no constitution establishing a more centralized government such as the federal goverment we have today, was necessary, except for the purposes of these aristocrats to establish the basis for a New World Order and to better protect their own assets from foreign aggression. We tend to consider the constitution as protection from intrusive government and think we are a Christian nation based upon its recognition of "inalienable rights." However, the constitution grants us nothing that was not already God-given and it does not serve for our protection, although we are deceived to think so, as it has been accepted in place of God. Those who worship not the one true God have no problem denying either or both, God and the constitution, and we see this thread throughout American history.
The Founding Fathers were not all present and the group that met were not all agreeable on the content and wording of the constitution and that disagreement came to be known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Those who were not a part of the masonic aristocrats desired less government authority, but mostly these were two factions within the Masonic brotherhood vying for personal control. The original signers of the Declaration of Independence were not all included in this meeting to devise a constitution. Afterall, this was for an altogether different purpose and many would have objected to meeting in secret in pretense in order to establish a corporate government over the several states who were satisfied with their Articles of Confederation.
The constitution is basically a religious and commercial document formed for the purposes of controlling the assets and trade activities of the people of the several states by the aristocrats, serving not the people but themselves and the banking interests and the Pope.
The constitution was necessary to consolidate the states under the control of a centralized authority, who was in turn controlled by Old World politics, religion, and money. "We the People" were the aristocrats, not the citizens of the states they sought to control. "A more perfect union" was nothing more than the perfecting of that method of control. The constitution did nothing to insure the freedom of the several states, but in fact, made the individual states more unfree. The wording of the constitution is subject to how it is perceived and it was intended to deceive. Because of that document we now look to the Federal government for everything imagineable. If it was to insure a republican from of government for every state, what happened? There are no republican forms of government in the several states and never have been since the constitution. They all have similiar constitutions of 'pretense' intended to deceive. The militia were a state function and for the protection of the state, but were lost by the state to the control of the federal government by the constitution. The federal government can 'federalize' the state's militia anytime it so desires. The legislators in the federal government can pass into law anything at will and are protected by the constitution from accountability because it depends upon others to police their own and that depends upon who they actually serve; afterall the constitution is just a piece of paper. I know all about the checks and balances supposedly built into the framework of government according to the constitution, but does it actually work? Not in my lifetime, it hasn't. When foxes build the hen house and maintain it perpetually, the only activity in this regards is when the foxes have a falling out within their own ranks. We are still the chickens they guard and control. The constitution belongs to the foxes, not the chickens. Try introducing the constitution in a federal court. You will be informed by the judge that it is not allowed and that is because it is not yours to use. It is not for our benefit, but for theirs. We are only subject to the constitution as is determined by those to whom it belongs and we have to volunteer to come under their control, such as we do when we file a perjured tax return, accept social security, etc. Of course, today, they are more and more 'volunteering' for us and using force to keep us in the henhouse.
Masonic and occultic influences are evident throughout American history from the founding until the present day. The constitution opened the door to Catholicism and the Jesuits immediately became a major player in advancing the beginnings of a New World Order. Schools of higher learning, such as Georgetown, would be established by the Jesuits in short order. When the British had been fought, it was basically a war between the Papacy and the Church of England. The constitution granted the Papacy (Jesuits) a visible presence in the New World, whereas Catholics had been barred due to both the awareness of the colonists of the role of the Church thru the Dark Ages and the fact that America was owned by the King of England, who was no longer on good terms with the Pope. All wars are religious wars when the truth is discovered, and such was our own war with the Crown, but it was instigated by the Masonic Brotherhood.
We have a CONstitutional government of the people it serves, for the people it serves, and by the people it serves, and that is not us. When they want to use it, they do; when they want to ignore it, they do so. They do just enough to keep us deceived into thinking it applies to us in ways it does not, and unaware that it mostly applies to us as assets, or as is more commonly known today, human resources; just chickens being guarded in their hen house expected to lay their eggs in return for their handouts. It's an entire world of chickens they seek, subject to their needs of production and subject to their use and disposal in a New World Order of their making. Those who have God do not need a false constitution formed by men. In fact, the constitution competes with God for our worship and attention.
We turn to this false document of Lucifer's world for needs that God ordains and offers to us. If you are a true Believer and study His Teaching diligently as instructed, why do you need a man-made document on which to depend for your God-given rights which include true liberty and respect for the rights (love) of others? The world is ruled by the money-lenders, the same type who Jesus threw out of the temple. The constitution was instituted by men at their behest for their benefit and they have ties to Pharisee Christianity and Rome. It is not even a binding document on any citizen. It was written by lawyers and made a contract binding only the signatories of the time, which does not include us. How do you bind future generations to any document of agreement? It has to be accepted over and over, which it is, by the powers that be. It is the only justification for their existence in the eyes of the deceived. Today, much like the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, we see the factions warring among themselves to define the constitution as a 'living' document, or to re-invent it's meanings. This is just the foxes warring among themselves for the control of the chickens, us. It has nothing to do with our rights as provided by God. It has to do with which fox group gets to deny us chickens those rights. They are competing with God as AntiChrists. They compete for the control of us and for our worship, and the constitution is their tool to use in that conquest.
We do not have a 'consent of the governed' simply by our right to vote, but we are led to believe that we have a constitution that demands and protects that. I have never consented to be governed; have you? Of course, I don't vote in their system and provide them that credibility. If we are to be governed by man rather than by God, then I don't believe in a secret ballot. Why should I not know who is against me? Why should I not know who are those that choose to vote for someone that will deny my rights; who want to see my property taxed; my right to self-defense destroyed, etc, etc? If you vote, you imply approval of the system that is intent upon destroying you. You are a participant in self-destruction. Voting or not, we are all paying the way for our own demise, regardless. It doesn't get any dumber than that.
