Endwatchers

IT AIN'T FUNNY...what they're doing to us in the name of doing it for us...
by Carl G. Loy

Politicians tend to deal in the sound bite and the immediate appeal to the few, while ignoring the ramifications of the effect of their actions on the majority now or in the future.

Government has simply lost all common sense and continually ignores the constitution, or any recognition of the basis for a free society. Perhaps that is the plan.

The collectivists, or call them Marxists, socialists, Leninists, or statists, or any combination thereof, they are still about one singular agenda, which is to control the masses they claim to represent, but do not.

Politicians are by their very nature rightly labeled one of the above. Those who enter politics and become parasites, do so because they have determined that they know better than anyone else, how the rest of us should be controlled and of course they would claim that it is for our own good, the 'common' good, a marxist-collectivist ideological mindset.

Politicians as government, crave the power to tell others what to do and how they should live; all for the common good, of course. Using the force of government, they restrict freedoms and take from the labors of the working masses on an ever increasing path to tolitarianism. It is simply the nature of the beast they serve and has become unlimited by any constitution to which they pledged their honor to uphold.

Every newspaper is plastered with headlines that could not exist if we had politicians who restrained government and prevented the unconstitutional socialism that is their lifeblood. Everything from school funding to gun laws, to no smoking rules, to zoning and property restrictions, to seat belts, abortion, medicare and social security, licensing, and war dominate headlines. Ignored completely is liberty and individual freedom. Liberty gets a little lip-service occasionally, but the actions demonstrate a complete disregard for freedom.

The best of good men, once becoming politicians, also become compromised and just another cog in the government machinery to force their will upon the rest of us. Even those who claim that they fought to keep some freedom infringement out of some bill, then voted for that same bill just because it was the best 'compromise.' Afterall, it could have been worse had it not been for their input and firm stand. Never addressed is the fact that it is most likely unconstitutional, or just plain wrong, whatever its substance.

Every politician in office will tell you he is covered up with bills to consider or instigate, committee meetings, etc. That is because they are making issues of things they have no right to even be considering in a free society. Politics is the Dialectic continually at work, distracting all of us, even themselves, from the real issues allowed to government in a free country, that is crying for moral statesmanship. Government seeks to control all behavior and there is nothing 'free' about that. We even have to pay for them to do what they do to us in the name of doing it for us.

Politicians think that they can fool the masses; they do fool most. If not, they would be seen as the 'emperor with no clothes.' Take for instance the fact that Georgia recently passed some new laws governing where its citizens can smoke. Promoted on the theory that second hand smoke is bad for health, and this is easily disputed by scientific studies, those who wanted to be seen as the more 'freedom' aware, took great pride in the fact that they caused the bill to be somewhat watered-down, and was not as all encompassing as first introduced. Nevermind that this is an issue, which is none of their constitutional business, and nevermind that it was based on flawed promotion, and nevermind that it was another loss of freedom, regardless of the outcome, some politicians will brag about how they 'voted for freedom.' What they mean is that they allowed to win, the one statist view appearing to seek absolute control, and who was glad to win just some amount of control, as was expected, knowing that this is an incremental step to that absolute end, eventually. It's like, ask for the moon and you can settle for a star; and the losers think they are the winners. I've never understood how some politicians can be so naive, unless it is all a staged event. Of course, one must understand that they are all 'statists' to more or lesser extent or they wouldn't be there in the first place. Our options seem to always be between whether we want more control faster, or less control gained more slowly, but even that is a misnomer. Control is control and freedom is always sacrificed. When government acts, it denies someone some amount of freedom. Those citizens who think they benefit when it seems in their own best interests what government has done at the expense of someone else, will sooner or later find that same power of government denying even themselves a freedom they cherish for that is the road being traveled when transgressions on individual rights are sacrificed for the collectivists' 'common good' ideology. The bottom line of 'common good' is what is best for government in terms of increasing control. Meanwhile, they tell us it is for us, or was the best they could do for us.

Politicians have many excuses for what transpires in their halls of injustice and offices of corruption and compromise, beyond the 'common good.' For instance, it could be little more than, "well, if I tried to fight that battle, I'd lose on the more important one coming up." Or, "I didn't want to use up my leverage on something less significant; priorities, you know." Or, "I had to go along on this one in order to get enough votes for the really important one that I'm working on." What happens to the best intentioned is that they give in here and there, always justifying it by 'saving' for the 'big one,' or 'no way to defeat it anyway,' and before long, compromise becomes a habit, a way of life, and just the way business is done in politics and they are no longer even aware of what principles were sacrificed. Like drawing a line in the sand, they keep backing up and drawing another, and another, and fairly soon, it's whatever is necessary to get re-elected. Afterall, if they can't get elected, how can they 'serve?" Tennessee Congressman Zack Wamp is one who seemed to be sincere and honorable in his pursuit of office, but once elected, and about a year later, one could begin to see the 'compromise' and the difference in what appeared to be the man running for office and the man emerging in office. Today he is as corrupted and compromised as the rest of the statists, but he still tries to claim he hasn't forgotten his roots and principles. When it doesn't cost him with his colleagues, he picks an issue for public consumption, but which goes nowhere. No longer does he expound upon returning our nation to constitutional limited government. He has learned well the game to be played if he wants to be 'one of them,' and he plays it well. It has nothing to do with protecting individual freedom, of course.

Politicians become one of two things in a corrupt system; players or pawns. Everyone wants to be a player. No one wants to be a pawn. It takes much compromise to become a real player. Even a pawn must be seen as a player if he is to get re-elected and that requires compromise, also.

Politicians are somebody's pawn, whether they be players or not. They are allowing themselves to be used by someone or some group, or some corporate agenda in some way in almost all that they do. That's a part of the game that politicians play.

Every vote in any legislative group, any state, any municipality, or federal, is one that is usually about an unconstitutional bill, or law or regulation, and is one that represents differing views of some measure of socialism or individual rights, but which usually relate to both. The answers they seek, address the wrong questions, and we are diverted from what should be the right questions. If a constitutional issue comes into play at all, it is seen in their attempts to find a way to circumvent that restraint. Government does not like restraint, whether it be by its' citizens or by its' constitution. Politicians do not like restraint. They want to control; to be in control; to tell others how to live; they want to restrain others who seek to protect their individual rights. Politicians think they know best; they are enlightened; they are simply much smarter than the rest of us, knowing things we do not know, and of course the latter is very true. They wouldn't want us to know what they know for they would be exposed. What goes on in secret would probably cause a revolution. Politicians are adept at smoke and screen tactics to hide their real agenda. Politicians are skilled at deceit. What you see is not what you get.

Politicians answer to money sources with which the citizen can't compete. The Federal Government long ago embarked on ways to bring the citizen of the states under federal control. They simply 'bought' the state legislators. Once state legislators accepted benefits, largess fed from the federal trough, they also acepted the controls that came with it. Those controls affected every aspect of the citizens life, compliments of your state legislators. This 'take from the citizen' and use a portion to buy control of them, did not go unnoticed by local politicians. Soon, it became the game to be played. Take from, offer carrots, with conditions, of course, and control was established, ever strengthing the state at the expense of individual freedom. Using 'good' to lure in the less astute is a basic principle of socialism.

Congressman Davy Crockett related how he had voted to give an amount of funds to a family whose home had burned, and how a constituent brought to his attention that it was not his to give and how it opened the door to more and more so-called good causes. Davy Crockett relates how he went back to Congress and voted against the final bill, while offering a personal donation and challenging others to do the same. The bill was defeated when he exposed it to the light of the constitution. The constitution has not changed but politicians have. They have bought and they have been bought and they no longer serve anyone but themselves and their financiers. Most probably have never read the constitution, don't own a copy, and certainly don't want to be bothered by it. They might drag out a quote on an occasion when that serves their purpose, but it is not a sincere consideration in anything they do, except when confronted with it and they have to try to find a means to bypass it. They don't like that. It's an inconvenience, not an obstacle, and they will not allow that restraint in their attempt to control others.

Politics make for strange bedfellows, was once often said. Politics often marry opposites in their compromising positions addressing some issues. These associations can have a Biblical signifigance for the true Believer Christian. I don't ever see that a consideration in the wheeling and dealing among those who claim to be Christian. Their fruits often expose their hypocricy in this regards. Too often they embrace the 'ends as justifying the means.' How else could they justify becoming an integral part of an antichrist system in the first place?

Politicians must certainly be competing with the "love of money is the root of all evil," since we don't have any money of value, considering that our dollars are instruments of debt to which we have been obligated by these politicians. If money is power, then power must be the root of all evil, for it is this power they seek to hold over others that eliminates both our money and our freedom.

Politicians cannot be trusted. Of course they never tell a lie; they just change their mind. Then how is it they keep selling us ocean front property in Arizona? Why do we keep believing such things so absurb? Well, should we not believe those with whom we trust the care and future of our very own children? Politicians will tell you that they want to help you, the poor working class, and they want what is best for your children, so they will even fund a pre-kindergarden for your little child. Free baby-setting for hard working parents? Besides, parents don't train their young children like they should be trained, and the government can do a much better job. So, let's just force others to fund these pre-K behavorial modification
brainwashing classes and make sure we have docile little new age citizens alienated from parents and looking to the state as master as early-on as possible. That is the real agenda. It is even spelled out in U.N. documents as a part of their blueprint for the world under one world governance. That's a collectivist one world society governed by these same type of people who think they should be in control. And they all say, "Just trust me; I know best."

Politicians do not have your interests at heart. They answer to a different drummer and the beat is to dimish your freedom so that they have more control. Their interests are in the bigger picture, one that includes their continuing in office and being accepted by their own legislative peers, and responding to the money sources. You, the citizen, get lip service and sound bites and propaganda and crumbs from the captain's table. The very nature of the system insures that the citizen is relegated to the least priority, while the larger whole of particular special interest groups are catered.

Politicians are thieves of the worse kind. They create the very laws and regulations they use to rob you by force. How much more tyrannical can you get? All politicians are socialists and socialism is legalized theft. Every penny they spend on a state level has to taken from the working citizen by using the force of government to do so and they have made that legal. It does not have to be right or moral or be reasonable by any standard or even be approached with common sense, and certainly liberty is not in the equation at all. It is just whatever they deem to be in their own best interests for power and control.

Politicians are bringing us into a new world order. Thinking they will play a major role in one world goverance, many are those who seek to play the game for the ultimate power and control. On a state level they are more the pawns being used, often unaware, in this road to world tyranny under which we will be forced to submit or die. State legislators and governors bow to the demands of federal agencies and U.N. mandates affecting everything from gun rights to property rights. Greenways and heritage sites all are conformed to planned areas for restrictions on human habitat under a coming world government.

Politicians are antichrists. What would you expect of those who are a part of the antichrist system that considers themselves as god, determining life and death for their subject slaves? Who lives; who dies? Is that not playing god? Government decides whether it be by abortion, or for crimes committed, or for the devalued being who hangs on too long, not to mention the willingness to sacrifice any number in corporate inspired warmongering efforts. Who are the most evil of all, and claim to be something they are not? They really do intend to control us from cradle to grave.

Well, this could go on forever and many reading this could add much that has not been mentioned. Look how long it'd take to just mention all the new laws enacted each year by politicians 'serving' our interests, by eliminating freedoms. And what about all those things that really matter and are their responsibility and that they never addresss? Illegal immigrants ring a bell? Isn't it cause for concern that we are constantly assaulted by infringements upon our individual inalienable rights yet what should be the objects of their endeavors are largely ignored. Do you really want to put your faith and trust in those who see compromise at best as a necessary evil and at worse, just the way the game is played and they do it for the common good? Do you want your own interests compromised? Do you understand that when they fight each other whether it is along party lines, or just issue based, they are not fighting for you, even though you may agree with them? They are all with the same overall objectives; just different ways of getting there, and they fight each other for control of you. When you understand, as did most of the Founders, that government and it's politicians, are the enemy of a free people and must be restrained; that the rights of one affect the rights of all; that protecting the rights of those with whom you disagree is of equal importance to the rights of those with whom you do agree; that government is tyranny to whatever degree you allow it to be and by it's very nature can be nothing else; that government embodies the use of force to exert it's control desiring to make subjects of it's human assets; that putting faith in man always reaps disappointment and will never rise to expectations; then and only then will you understand the difference between freedom and slavery. There are no degrees of freedom nor are there degrees of slavery. You are either free or you are a slave. Some are just beginning to recognize our slavery and they can see how it has progressed. At first we were slaves treated rather well by our masters and too ignorant to see that we were under manipulation. As we became less well treated and the lies of the masters became more evident, some of us became less satisfied with our status and began to try to expose the system and awaken others to the fraud, and the true nature of the beast became more evident. Perhaps it is too late seek honest government, but it is not too late to "come out of her" and refuse to participate. It is not too late to seek the One True Master and live separately from the antichrist of man's humanist government, while we await that anticipated persecution promised to all who follow the Teachings of Jesus Christ. The politicians will answer His Judgement in due course.

The Politics of Murder by the State................

Why is anyone suprised by the position of the state in the case of Terri Schiavo?

Is it because they are so blatant in their disregard for human life in just this one particular instance? It's not as if this is an anomaly. It may well be just a part of our being 'conditioned' for what is to come.

Meanwhile, the politicians are having a field day. The courts are exercising an arrogrant display of power. The media are gleefully reporting the events. The pundits are in their heaven. The lawyers strut in their limelight. The entire episode is taking on the appearance of a last minute virgil at some prison before the accused and convicted prisoner is put to death by the state. It seems to offer something for everyone and everyone is getting their "15 minutes" of fame. Oddly, the churches remain largely silent, except for those charlatans always in the mix of anything that resembles a religious issue, but even they are not as vocal as usual.

The obvious malpractice of the state began long ago when the State of Florida elected to grant to the husband, the usual custody or guardianship of his wife. I say obvious because it was obvious that the husband had disserted his wife for another and this was no longer a usual case of husband being the proper one to make such decisions for the wife. One has to wonder just what were the motives of this state court in ignoring the obvious, that the husband could not have the wife's best interests at heart, and that the parents most likely did. Thus began the politics of murder in this case. The wisdom of Solomon would have allowed this disabled one to be placed in the care of those who would willingly sacrifice their time and assets to benefit the needy requirements of their loved one. When the husband violated his vows, "until death do us part," that was obvious indication that he might not be truthful about the 'victim's' desire to die under these circumstances. Yet, the court not only granted him custody, but upheld his desire that her life be ended. Something doesn't fit in this picture unless this entire case was looked upon as a means of increasing the state's power over life and death and it was envisioned to be a precedent setting opportunity.

Murder by the state has always been a matter of politics, whether it be by abortion, or by capital punishment. It provides a means for the state to measure and judge the attitudes of society and gradually mold the thinking of society. It offers a great 'dialectic' opportunity.

In the case of the criminal facing state ordered death, society has always been divided, and we have seen no equally applied 'justice' in the use of the death penalty. In fact, the criminal has much opportunity to prolong life far beyond reasonable, once the sentence has had alternate remedy exhausted. Politics always comes into play from the trials to the act of state caused death. The courts show their power deciding life or death, regardless of supposed jury findings. Abortion has been a political football since the courts determined that a woman's right to convenience, superseded the right to life of a pre-born, or fetus.

Dr. Kavorkian (sp?) serves 'time' for exactly what the state has now authorized in this case.

The politics surrounding this case provide opposing views much fodder, thus enabling the dialectic to be utilized to great extent, while distracting us all from many other issues and ongoing atrocities. Some politicians will say they did all they could do to protect life in this instance, and many will fall at their feet for that perceived endeavor.

The devil in the details began with court ordered custody to the 'cheating' husband. It ended with the denial, not so much of a 'tube' being re-inserted, but by the refusal to allow even sip of water to pass the 'victim's' lips. These two facts alone should be enough to awaken, all who care, to the politics of murder by our non-christian antichrist government that would be god. If not now, when do we 'come out of her?'

Carl G. Loy