Thursday, September 22, 2005
These Lying Times....Vaccines to Die For
by Carl G Loy
9/22/05
Since vaccines are so widely used and promoted by government, and since they are administered to infants and small children who can only depend upon adults for their safety, it would behoove us to know what we are giving these trusting little souls. The problem with adults is that we trust government; we trust drug companies; we trust the medical profession. We blindly accept whatever is presented as in the best interests of society and the need for innoculation of children against various diseases has been imbedded in our psychic for a lifetime. I remember when I received a smallpox vaccination, when I became of 'school age.'
I was five at the time and entering first grade. Supposedly, it was required before you could enter school, so my parents dutifully took me for my vaccination, as did all other parents take their children. Nevermind that smallpox was not a threat by that time, and had not been for years. Nevermind that by law, no parent could be forced to have their child innoculated. The school administration presented it as 'required' for a child to enter public school and parents just accepted that propaganda and thought it was a good thing to do.
Today, we see evidence that America is not a healthier nation in spite of the eradication of many childhood diseases, as well as many having been eliminated that affect adults. There is also now a history that provides evidence that many diseases run their course regardless of vaccinations and the fact that many were vaccinated did not necessarily offer protection, nor did those who were not vaccinated, necessarily become victims to the disease. So why all this emphasis placed on vaccines? They have not proved to be totally affective in any instance; have been practically ineffectual in some instances, and have had adverse effects in many instances. Shouldn't parents know the potential for harm from vaccines, as well as the risk of not allowing vaccinations? Why doesn't the government and the medical profession level with us? After all, parents are supposed to make intelligent decisions in the best interests of their child. We're talking about best for the individual child, not what some bureaucrat thinks is best for the group. Sure, it sounds right; school age children protecting each other from contagious diseases by all participating in a vaccination regime. Who would want to take a chance that an infant could be at risk by not being injected with 'safe' preventive vaccines?
There are many reasons that health is not what it should be in a society such as we have with all the scientific progress and the most modern technology available. It is common knowledge that improper diet is one source of our problem, but that is another subject, although it too is affected by deceptive practices of big corporations and big government. It is also common knowledge that our habits of using substances, such as tobacco and alcohol can affect health, but lack of exercise is probably as pertinent as diet affecting the general health of people. Legalized drugs are much more a factor in poor health than most people realize and vaccines administered to children start our course toward a sick, drug using society. Many illnesses that affect adults later in life may well be the result of the affects of earlier innoculations, which means more drugs and still more drugs to offset side affects of other drugs, and health does not improve in the general population in spite of all this use of drugs. In fact, studies show health is steadily deteriorating.
Parents should be very careful about what they allow injected into their children, beginning at the hospital at birth. Some who have been reluctant or refused to allow their infant to be innoculated have been pressured and harassed by both hospitals and authorities and even forced to stand by while vaccines are administered against their wishes under threat of losing their child to state care. Such incidents are not as unusual as you might think. More and more, parents are becoming aware that something just doesn't seem right about government enforced vaccinations and they are beginning to realize that they are not being made aware of the possible dangers and adverse side-affects of these drugs. These negative aspects include life long illnesses, diminished immune systems, seizures, brain damage, eventual behavioral problems, affected nervous systems, and immediate or delayed death. This "one-size" fits all mentality does not bode well for children or adults because it disregards individual differences. A vaccine may have no immediate adverse affect on one child, yet kill another. That is a strong indication that one vaccine to serve all, is extremely inappropriate and very dangerous. Yet, we continue to offer up our children, gambling that they will not be one of the ones that is so affected. Who would tell their children to go play in the street, because the odds are that traffic will stop, or because there is little traffic? Yet, we think little about forcing our children to risk the greater dangers of unsafe vaccines. The "it won't happen to my child" mentality and the blind faith placed in government and drug compaines has combined to make vegetables out of a lot of kids, and many have regretted their trust. The media is mostly silent about adverse reactions, while quick to promote the propaganda of government and the medical profession regarding the necessity of vaccinating your child.
While some childhood diseases have had dire consequences for a few infants, the fact is that those who had these diseases had better immune systems to fight other diseases later in life, and without which lifelong chronic illness has too often been the result. It appears from some studies that the adverse reactions and lifelong threat derived from vaccines has had more dire consequences than the diseases themselves served upon those who had not taken vaccines, and in fact those who had the diseases had healthier lives with a lower mortality rate. That should be astounding enough to give pause to subjecting children to the risks of unsafe vaccines. Parents must be responsible for their children just as God intended, and parents should not place trust in government, seems to be the moral here.
The use of vaccines has seldom shown affectiveness against their claimed prevention of disease. That may be hard to believe, but studies and research have shown this to be true and this knowledge can be acquired from the scientific journals of the medical profession. It is not hidden; it just isn't publicized for easy access by the average person. These studies do not show that the use of vaccines was responsible for the decline of a disease. Of course, this is a contradiction to the propaganda put forth by government and drug companies. The FDA, drug companies, Center for Disease Control, World Health Organization, hospitals, most medical journals, medical professionals, etc have joined together to obscure the facts and minimize the truth, to deceive the public. The public is left to its' own initiative to research the myths and lies and uncover the truth about vaccines.
Possibly the best example of the farce behind innoculations is that of the Salk vaccine used to prevent polio. Research now provides a strong case for denying that this vaccine had any affect at all on eliminating polio. The incidence of polio and vaccine use during periods of time in the U.S. and in other countries, is worthy of a look. First of all, polio rates had dropped over 50% in the U.S. before the vaccine was introduced and simply continued it's decline after the vaccine came into use. Secondly, in other countries where polio was experienced and where the vaccine was not in use, that same decline continued, also. The fact is that polio was not a serious problem in the general population until mass innoculations were begun for diptheria and whooping cough, after which the incidence of polio skyrocketed in those states where those vaccines were most widlely implemented. In 1955, the definition of polio was changed and no longer included were other froms of disease, such as a type of meningitis, and this of course allowed for the reporting of fewer cases of polio, which was then said to be the result of taking the vaccine. Jonas Salk, who 'invented' this virus killer vaccine and which was so widely administered in the 50's in the U.S. actually stated in 1976 that all cases of polio in the U.S. since 1961 were probably due to taking the oral vaccine for polio. In 1992, the CDC published a report that stated that all cases of polio in the U.S. since 1979 were the direct result of taking the oral vaccine. Meanwhile, there were also thousands of cases of adverse reactions, even deaths related to taking the vaccine and eventually, the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services warned parents that the vaccine could cause serious reactions, even death. Since then, it has been proven that the vaccine contained a deadly ingredient that causes cancer and which can be passed sexually and from mother to child. In spite of official denials, this is well researched and documented. There is also evidence from a Harvard study, that the Salk polio vaccine can affect the immune system in much the same manner as does so-called AIDS / HIV. Yet, this vaccine is still on the market today, approved by the FDA.
Tetanus is another case of deceit. Most of the problem is associated from poor hygiene and improper dressing and care of wounds. When tetanus shots were introduced the incidence of tetanus climbed dramatically. Recent studies indicate that infants and small children receiving these shots are most likely to have asthma and allergic difficulties, while those who have not been injected had no incidence of such. Most all serious problems associated with this disease occur in people over 50. The incidence of adverse reactions to the shot when given to children is phenomenal and includes immune deficiency indications similar to AIDS / HIV. Allergies that include breathing problems are reported in many cases immediately after injections. Published in 2000, studies covering 1984 to 1996 indicated that 80% of people experiencing sinus problems could have been prevented by having abstained from tetanus injections. Tetanus injections continue today with no warnings about adverse affects.
Like polio, measles was a declining disease long before the vaccine was introduced to prevent measles. Generally its occurrence was of no serious consequence except in poverty areas where conditions of sanitation and malnourishment existed. Yet, a big promotion for the vaccine employed scare tactics to encourage all parents to have their children vaccinated. The World Health Organization has even stated that children who have been vaccinated are 15 times more likely to acquire the disease. In 1989, 89% of all U.S. children who contracted the disease, had been vaccinated. There have been serious reactions to this vaccine, also, but it is still available and in use.
Mumps is a fairly 'safe' disease with cases that become severe from other symptoms being very rare. The recorded adverse affects of the vaccine for mumps number far greater than the recorded serious problems associated with the disease. The vaccine is inaffective as is seen by several documented incidents of those having had the disease after having takern the vaccine. One example is that 67 of 68 Tennessee school students innoculated with the vaccine caught the disease during an outbreak in 1991, and there are many other examples. By the drug companies own records and warnings, the vaccine has caused meningitus, encephalitis, diabetes, among other things, as well as death. The vaccine is still in use.
Whooping cough, (Pertussis) is another disease that was disappearing before the vaccine was introduced. While the disease is rarely fatal, the vaccine has a record of severe reactions in one of every 200 children who receive it and death has also resulted. The Pertussis vaccine is known to be the cause of 'crib death' or suden infant death syndrone, yet officials deny the evidence and still say there is no connection, a blantant lie.
Diphtheria is another disease that was in decline when a vaccine was introduced and which has been proven to be ineffective. The definition was changed in 1979, eliminating a grouping of other conditions with diphtheria, making it appear that the vaccine was affective. It is now admitted that there is no lasting benefit from the vaccine and no one is advising the use of it. Like Pertussis, Tetanus, and some other vaccines, the use of formaldehyde, aluminum, and mercury in the vaccine are known toxins and cancer causing agents.
The record of disease and vaccines clearly shows that vaccines are worse than the disease, and that government control has offered no protection in removing unsafe vaccines from the market. In fact it has encouraged the taking of unsafe vaccines and been very much involved in false assertions regarding benefits and adverse reactions. Smallpox ceased only after the vaccine was discontinued. That seems to be the general trend. Yet, the government continues to make mandatory the taking of some vaccines with records of risk far exceeding that of experiencing the disease. Chicken pox and a variety of diseases that vaccines claim to prevent is contradicted by the record, and in spite of known dangers, some states continue to require them used in children. Many states require vaccines known to cause autism, MS, brain damage, autoimmune disorders, and death. Parents are sacrificing their children at the altar of the state.
70% of doctors and nurses surveyed do not take flu shots and it is proven that no real protection is offered by the vaccine, but it can have adverse side affects. Some health care workers are required to take the vaccine in order to protect their jobs. Yet, in spite of the known evidence of little benefit and possible risks, there are many who trust their doctor and government and depend on the vaccine for protection.
There is little doubt that there is a huge cover-up by government and the medical profession and drug companies to hide the lack of value of vaccines to prevent disease, and the known dangers associated with their use. In addition to the billions of dollars involved, there is a 'brotherhood' type connection between the drug companies and government at the highest levels that bond them together, and an agenda in play that seeks to destroy, rather than improve. In the name of concern for our health and welfare, we are being poisoned and made victims of drug use for the increased wealth and control by the Elite. We have been deceived and both ourselves and our children are destined to experience health problems that should never have occurred, as well as die earlier. Legalized drugs, including vaccines are far more deadly and unsafe than most illegal drugs. It is all about whose coffers are filled and who is in control. Government and Big Pharma do not care about your health except to insure that drugs are thought by us to be required to have it. In fact they care more that people will live too long; there are just too many of us on the planet, they think. Is that why we are led to believe that "poison" is good for our kids? Or is it just about profits? Either or both, it is a travesty and it is a fact that vaccines are poisonous and from the use of which many never recover, or will experience various symptoms and suffering that lasts a lifetime.
The above is only the tip of the iceberg. It is heart-wrenching to read the testimonials from mothers whose babies or small children have been victims of unsafe vaccines. They are not isolated cases that we might consider rare. There are thousands of examples of disabilities and deaths resulting from the use of FDA 'approved' unsafe vaccines. These mothers trusted government and the medical profession with the safety of their children. They did so because they believed the lies and were not made aware of the true facts. This is a continuing saga
of emotional stress, suffering, and death by victims of government deceit. It will stop only when parents take full responsibility for their children and stop trusting government with the health and care of their children. A proper diet and rest are far more important for the good health of a child, than is some vaccine that can paralyze or kill and which offers little or no benefit. Kids do catch colds and contagious viruses are easily spread, but in the case of an average healthy child, his immune system is strengthened by that experience and it benefits him later in life, also. If you want to prevent some of these illnesses being brought home from school, homeschool; that's a nice side benefit from homeschooling. Refuse vaccines and homeschool; that will make for the most safe environment and learning situation that is available and the parent who wants to take full responsibility of their children is doing that.
I expect more will do so in the future as "things wax worse."
Recommended Resources: "Vaccines" are they really safe and effective? c 2003
by Neil Z. Miller and "Vaccination" the hidden truth" (DVD) www.vaccination.inoz.com
9/22/05
Since vaccines are so widely used and promoted by government, and since they are administered to infants and small children who can only depend upon adults for their safety, it would behoove us to know what we are giving these trusting little souls. The problem with adults is that we trust government; we trust drug companies; we trust the medical profession. We blindly accept whatever is presented as in the best interests of society and the need for innoculation of children against various diseases has been imbedded in our psychic for a lifetime. I remember when I received a smallpox vaccination, when I became of 'school age.'
I was five at the time and entering first grade. Supposedly, it was required before you could enter school, so my parents dutifully took me for my vaccination, as did all other parents take their children. Nevermind that smallpox was not a threat by that time, and had not been for years. Nevermind that by law, no parent could be forced to have their child innoculated. The school administration presented it as 'required' for a child to enter public school and parents just accepted that propaganda and thought it was a good thing to do.
Today, we see evidence that America is not a healthier nation in spite of the eradication of many childhood diseases, as well as many having been eliminated that affect adults. There is also now a history that provides evidence that many diseases run their course regardless of vaccinations and the fact that many were vaccinated did not necessarily offer protection, nor did those who were not vaccinated, necessarily become victims to the disease. So why all this emphasis placed on vaccines? They have not proved to be totally affective in any instance; have been practically ineffectual in some instances, and have had adverse effects in many instances. Shouldn't parents know the potential for harm from vaccines, as well as the risk of not allowing vaccinations? Why doesn't the government and the medical profession level with us? After all, parents are supposed to make intelligent decisions in the best interests of their child. We're talking about best for the individual child, not what some bureaucrat thinks is best for the group. Sure, it sounds right; school age children protecting each other from contagious diseases by all participating in a vaccination regime. Who would want to take a chance that an infant could be at risk by not being injected with 'safe' preventive vaccines?
There are many reasons that health is not what it should be in a society such as we have with all the scientific progress and the most modern technology available. It is common knowledge that improper diet is one source of our problem, but that is another subject, although it too is affected by deceptive practices of big corporations and big government. It is also common knowledge that our habits of using substances, such as tobacco and alcohol can affect health, but lack of exercise is probably as pertinent as diet affecting the general health of people. Legalized drugs are much more a factor in poor health than most people realize and vaccines administered to children start our course toward a sick, drug using society. Many illnesses that affect adults later in life may well be the result of the affects of earlier innoculations, which means more drugs and still more drugs to offset side affects of other drugs, and health does not improve in the general population in spite of all this use of drugs. In fact, studies show health is steadily deteriorating.
Parents should be very careful about what they allow injected into their children, beginning at the hospital at birth. Some who have been reluctant or refused to allow their infant to be innoculated have been pressured and harassed by both hospitals and authorities and even forced to stand by while vaccines are administered against their wishes under threat of losing their child to state care. Such incidents are not as unusual as you might think. More and more, parents are becoming aware that something just doesn't seem right about government enforced vaccinations and they are beginning to realize that they are not being made aware of the possible dangers and adverse side-affects of these drugs. These negative aspects include life long illnesses, diminished immune systems, seizures, brain damage, eventual behavioral problems, affected nervous systems, and immediate or delayed death. This "one-size" fits all mentality does not bode well for children or adults because it disregards individual differences. A vaccine may have no immediate adverse affect on one child, yet kill another. That is a strong indication that one vaccine to serve all, is extremely inappropriate and very dangerous. Yet, we continue to offer up our children, gambling that they will not be one of the ones that is so affected. Who would tell their children to go play in the street, because the odds are that traffic will stop, or because there is little traffic? Yet, we think little about forcing our children to risk the greater dangers of unsafe vaccines. The "it won't happen to my child" mentality and the blind faith placed in government and drug compaines has combined to make vegetables out of a lot of kids, and many have regretted their trust. The media is mostly silent about adverse reactions, while quick to promote the propaganda of government and the medical profession regarding the necessity of vaccinating your child.
While some childhood diseases have had dire consequences for a few infants, the fact is that those who had these diseases had better immune systems to fight other diseases later in life, and without which lifelong chronic illness has too often been the result. It appears from some studies that the adverse reactions and lifelong threat derived from vaccines has had more dire consequences than the diseases themselves served upon those who had not taken vaccines, and in fact those who had the diseases had healthier lives with a lower mortality rate. That should be astounding enough to give pause to subjecting children to the risks of unsafe vaccines. Parents must be responsible for their children just as God intended, and parents should not place trust in government, seems to be the moral here.
The use of vaccines has seldom shown affectiveness against their claimed prevention of disease. That may be hard to believe, but studies and research have shown this to be true and this knowledge can be acquired from the scientific journals of the medical profession. It is not hidden; it just isn't publicized for easy access by the average person. These studies do not show that the use of vaccines was responsible for the decline of a disease. Of course, this is a contradiction to the propaganda put forth by government and drug companies. The FDA, drug companies, Center for Disease Control, World Health Organization, hospitals, most medical journals, medical professionals, etc have joined together to obscure the facts and minimize the truth, to deceive the public. The public is left to its' own initiative to research the myths and lies and uncover the truth about vaccines.
Possibly the best example of the farce behind innoculations is that of the Salk vaccine used to prevent polio. Research now provides a strong case for denying that this vaccine had any affect at all on eliminating polio. The incidence of polio and vaccine use during periods of time in the U.S. and in other countries, is worthy of a look. First of all, polio rates had dropped over 50% in the U.S. before the vaccine was introduced and simply continued it's decline after the vaccine came into use. Secondly, in other countries where polio was experienced and where the vaccine was not in use, that same decline continued, also. The fact is that polio was not a serious problem in the general population until mass innoculations were begun for diptheria and whooping cough, after which the incidence of polio skyrocketed in those states where those vaccines were most widlely implemented. In 1955, the definition of polio was changed and no longer included were other froms of disease, such as a type of meningitis, and this of course allowed for the reporting of fewer cases of polio, which was then said to be the result of taking the vaccine. Jonas Salk, who 'invented' this virus killer vaccine and which was so widely administered in the 50's in the U.S. actually stated in 1976 that all cases of polio in the U.S. since 1961 were probably due to taking the oral vaccine for polio. In 1992, the CDC published a report that stated that all cases of polio in the U.S. since 1979 were the direct result of taking the oral vaccine. Meanwhile, there were also thousands of cases of adverse reactions, even deaths related to taking the vaccine and eventually, the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services warned parents that the vaccine could cause serious reactions, even death. Since then, it has been proven that the vaccine contained a deadly ingredient that causes cancer and which can be passed sexually and from mother to child. In spite of official denials, this is well researched and documented. There is also evidence from a Harvard study, that the Salk polio vaccine can affect the immune system in much the same manner as does so-called AIDS / HIV. Yet, this vaccine is still on the market today, approved by the FDA.
Tetanus is another case of deceit. Most of the problem is associated from poor hygiene and improper dressing and care of wounds. When tetanus shots were introduced the incidence of tetanus climbed dramatically. Recent studies indicate that infants and small children receiving these shots are most likely to have asthma and allergic difficulties, while those who have not been injected had no incidence of such. Most all serious problems associated with this disease occur in people over 50. The incidence of adverse reactions to the shot when given to children is phenomenal and includes immune deficiency indications similar to AIDS / HIV. Allergies that include breathing problems are reported in many cases immediately after injections. Published in 2000, studies covering 1984 to 1996 indicated that 80% of people experiencing sinus problems could have been prevented by having abstained from tetanus injections. Tetanus injections continue today with no warnings about adverse affects.
Like polio, measles was a declining disease long before the vaccine was introduced to prevent measles. Generally its occurrence was of no serious consequence except in poverty areas where conditions of sanitation and malnourishment existed. Yet, a big promotion for the vaccine employed scare tactics to encourage all parents to have their children vaccinated. The World Health Organization has even stated that children who have been vaccinated are 15 times more likely to acquire the disease. In 1989, 89% of all U.S. children who contracted the disease, had been vaccinated. There have been serious reactions to this vaccine, also, but it is still available and in use.
Mumps is a fairly 'safe' disease with cases that become severe from other symptoms being very rare. The recorded adverse affects of the vaccine for mumps number far greater than the recorded serious problems associated with the disease. The vaccine is inaffective as is seen by several documented incidents of those having had the disease after having takern the vaccine. One example is that 67 of 68 Tennessee school students innoculated with the vaccine caught the disease during an outbreak in 1991, and there are many other examples. By the drug companies own records and warnings, the vaccine has caused meningitus, encephalitis, diabetes, among other things, as well as death. The vaccine is still in use.
Whooping cough, (Pertussis) is another disease that was disappearing before the vaccine was introduced. While the disease is rarely fatal, the vaccine has a record of severe reactions in one of every 200 children who receive it and death has also resulted. The Pertussis vaccine is known to be the cause of 'crib death' or suden infant death syndrone, yet officials deny the evidence and still say there is no connection, a blantant lie.
Diphtheria is another disease that was in decline when a vaccine was introduced and which has been proven to be ineffective. The definition was changed in 1979, eliminating a grouping of other conditions with diphtheria, making it appear that the vaccine was affective. It is now admitted that there is no lasting benefit from the vaccine and no one is advising the use of it. Like Pertussis, Tetanus, and some other vaccines, the use of formaldehyde, aluminum, and mercury in the vaccine are known toxins and cancer causing agents.
The record of disease and vaccines clearly shows that vaccines are worse than the disease, and that government control has offered no protection in removing unsafe vaccines from the market. In fact it has encouraged the taking of unsafe vaccines and been very much involved in false assertions regarding benefits and adverse reactions. Smallpox ceased only after the vaccine was discontinued. That seems to be the general trend. Yet, the government continues to make mandatory the taking of some vaccines with records of risk far exceeding that of experiencing the disease. Chicken pox and a variety of diseases that vaccines claim to prevent is contradicted by the record, and in spite of known dangers, some states continue to require them used in children. Many states require vaccines known to cause autism, MS, brain damage, autoimmune disorders, and death. Parents are sacrificing their children at the altar of the state.
70% of doctors and nurses surveyed do not take flu shots and it is proven that no real protection is offered by the vaccine, but it can have adverse side affects. Some health care workers are required to take the vaccine in order to protect their jobs. Yet, in spite of the known evidence of little benefit and possible risks, there are many who trust their doctor and government and depend on the vaccine for protection.
There is little doubt that there is a huge cover-up by government and the medical profession and drug companies to hide the lack of value of vaccines to prevent disease, and the known dangers associated with their use. In addition to the billions of dollars involved, there is a 'brotherhood' type connection between the drug companies and government at the highest levels that bond them together, and an agenda in play that seeks to destroy, rather than improve. In the name of concern for our health and welfare, we are being poisoned and made victims of drug use for the increased wealth and control by the Elite. We have been deceived and both ourselves and our children are destined to experience health problems that should never have occurred, as well as die earlier. Legalized drugs, including vaccines are far more deadly and unsafe than most illegal drugs. It is all about whose coffers are filled and who is in control. Government and Big Pharma do not care about your health except to insure that drugs are thought by us to be required to have it. In fact they care more that people will live too long; there are just too many of us on the planet, they think. Is that why we are led to believe that "poison" is good for our kids? Or is it just about profits? Either or both, it is a travesty and it is a fact that vaccines are poisonous and from the use of which many never recover, or will experience various symptoms and suffering that lasts a lifetime.
The above is only the tip of the iceberg. It is heart-wrenching to read the testimonials from mothers whose babies or small children have been victims of unsafe vaccines. They are not isolated cases that we might consider rare. There are thousands of examples of disabilities and deaths resulting from the use of FDA 'approved' unsafe vaccines. These mothers trusted government and the medical profession with the safety of their children. They did so because they believed the lies and were not made aware of the true facts. This is a continuing saga
of emotional stress, suffering, and death by victims of government deceit. It will stop only when parents take full responsibility for their children and stop trusting government with the health and care of their children. A proper diet and rest are far more important for the good health of a child, than is some vaccine that can paralyze or kill and which offers little or no benefit. Kids do catch colds and contagious viruses are easily spread, but in the case of an average healthy child, his immune system is strengthened by that experience and it benefits him later in life, also. If you want to prevent some of these illnesses being brought home from school, homeschool; that's a nice side benefit from homeschooling. Refuse vaccines and homeschool; that will make for the most safe environment and learning situation that is available and the parent who wants to take full responsibility of their children is doing that.
I expect more will do so in the future as "things wax worse."
Recommended Resources: "Vaccines" are they really safe and effective? c 2003
by Neil Z. Miller and "Vaccination" the hidden truth" (DVD) www.vaccination.inoz.com
