Endwatchers

These Lying Times.... Never Asking the Right Questions
....Mind Manipulation by Government, Media, & Religion

by Carl G Loy
10/22/05

Everywhere we turn, it seems there is an issue to address. We are bombarded by whatever is the issue, or issues, that are determined by those who would seek to steer our mental perceptions. Controlling what we think about appears to be the goal. Basic to that goal is the attempt to cover up what is wished not known and distractions are much provided to insure we have our attentions diverted to issues created for our consumption; not beneficial to us, but beneficial to those in power. Once we understand that government and media are controlled and answering to another master with specific goals, and if we know what those goals are, we can better understand the need by them for us to live largely in a state of unawareness. That religion plays a role in all of this should not be surprising to the discerning. While the Papacy knows full well their role, the incorporated churches in America are mostly unaware of their own deceived state and they march lockstep with the government in advancing the American New World Order of Antichrist.

We have allowed the media to define issues and we are led to believe that we should place ourselves on one side or the other. Spin is their forte'. It has a purpose, of course. The purpose is to divert our attention or to influence and mold our thinking. We are inundated with issues they present, slanted in the way they determine will steer us to select the side we choose to be on. That allows us to think that it is our decision and our own intelligence that determines this for us. They attempt to provide the answers that we will accept,
regardless of which 'side' we have chosen. Therefore, we never come close to asking the right questions. We just question which side to take, not whether or not there is a larger question unaddressed by the issues we are presented. Analytical? What's that? We don't analyize anything; we just accept what we are told. And we take sides based on what we are told. Let's make it simple to understand. Someone has a lake. They advertise the fishing opportunity. The promotion includes that some have found the south side to be filled with bass; another promotes the north side for catfish. To make more confusing, we hear that best catches are mornings, yet others say it's evenings. Someone else is quoted as saying it depends on what time of month. We go fishing. (Greed plays its' part) We see that someone else has caught something on the southside. Another person sees something on the northside. We are in a delima on which side to choose, but since we prefer to be bass fishing, we take the south side and after a few bites, we think we made the proper decision as to the side we should have taken. Yet, we never asked the right questions. Is there really any fish in this lake of a size worth catching regardless of where they are located? We may get all caught up in catching minnows because we only questioned on which side to fish. The lake owner gave us a choice of which side to find what, not whether or not there was anything substantial there in either case, but our attention was directed to what kind and what location. By the time we are disappointed and starting to ask the right question, someone offers a new location and a different set of fishing circumstances. We forget about that lake and that experience and head for the new. Once again we are steered to the questions we should ask which allow us to pick a side. Such are the issues we are faced with. Two houses burn side by side. The media pundits or 'talking heads' tell us that investigations are underway to determine which house caught first and caused the other to burn, overlooking the real question; was it arson or other causes and if so, why? If it involves someone or something they want to protect, we will probably never know the cause. If things heat up with outside investigations, they may well set up a fall guy, or even sacrific one of their own, if there is a larger picture to be hidden. Hey, "a vagrant" did it because he had a problem with one of the occupants; or a suicide later offers some seemingly plausible explanation for the fire, nevermind that the owner who rented the houses wanted to collect the insurance.
It was much easier to direct our attention to the unusual behavior of George Bush when the twin towers were being struck and that immediately presented an issue where, mostly partisan, sides could be taken. This distracted us from asking the real questions. Afterall, everyone saw the 'behavior' and it can be made to appear that he is being held responsible for his behavior. Some people excuse his behavior; others think he wasn't in control, but it goes nowhere.

9/11 is replete with so many examples of this it has spawned dozens of books and videos. Persistent questioning by several people leading to the right questions and exposing the cover up has resulted in some of the most ridiculous answers and non-answers and evasions, and faked investigations, that one wonders if they think there are really that many dumb Americans, or do they just think we're too inattentive to notice.

Nothing has been more conducive to the confusing of issues and presenting issues to keep us distracted and occupied, often appealing to our emotions, as has been and is, politics and a 'two-party' system. Aside from party loyalities, we have the diversions created by other labels, such as conservative and liberal. This allows the issues to be defined for us and presented in a manner to encourage us to make a choice in what we support and do not support. Often the first question should just be, 'why is this an issue in the first place,' but no, we fall hook, line, and sinker into the 'choice' trap, taking a side, often with much enthusiasm. Many devote a tremendous amount of time and energy in efforts to follow their choice and persuade others to the side they have taken. How better to "divide and conquer" a people than with a two-party system controlled and manipulated by a criminal government?

Government as we now have, could not long exist if only truth were told by the media. If only the real questions were presented, there could exist no cover ups for long that would not be discovered and the culprits weeded out of the system. We are continually presented issues such as how much money to spend on what, increased funding for education, medicare, etc. Yet, the question is never asked, 'should government even be involved in socialism in this way?" We have been told since childhood that there are two sides to everything. As teenagers we began to have a rather gooid idea of which side of any number of issues we think we should take. The concept of 'two sides' becomes more cemented in adulthood. Most never break away from that mentality and never think outside that box, and government and the media want to keep us there. It allows for easier manipulation and planned outcomes. Limiting the issues to providing a choice between two views, effectively hides the larger picture and questions related thereto that should be asked.

History records a different picture when truth is exposed, but since we seem to learn so little from that, it is not seen as much of a threat to the ongoing agenda to coverup and keep us divided on the lesser issues and manipulated spin of controlled information. We can look back and see the atrocities committed on Randy Weaver, at Waco, the 1993 World Trade Center fiasco, and OKC, but somehow we can't seem to make the connections to 9/11. We can now understand that WWI and WWII with it's Pearl Harbor were the results of planned incidents to deceive us, yet we seem to think of those as isolated incidents and don't apply it to today. Korea and Vietnam and our actions there on behalf of the U.N. are largely ignored and Iraq is seen as a war against terrorism, when it has nothing at all to do with terrorism, such is the persuasion of the media. All issues become fodder for 'opposing sides' to define the issues for us and here again we are given predetermined choices. We choose and think we are doing so because we are free to do so, while it is freedom that is being curtailed. Mind manipulation and controlled perceptions of issues defined for us, limiting choice to a two-sided picture, covering up the larger picture to avoid the right questions, is not freedom. All that is necessary to put the real issues to rest is the passing of a generation, at which point even the powers that be, can appear above board by going back and criticizing their own who are gone. They tidy up the loose ends to make it appear an anomaly of the time.

Most Americans cannot seem to fathom the cruelty of mankind in their own day and time. Even those who know and understand history as recent as Vietnam with its Cambodia and Laos CIA involvement and their "killing fields," don't seem to connect that same CIA with events since that time up to and including 911 and Iraq. Thinking that our government, our CIA, our state dept, etc could have any involvement in the cruelty that is history is beyond perception, much less believing that it is ongoing this very minute. We can grasp the versions told about Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin, and Hitler and a few African despots, and their tyranny, but we can't picture that coming from our own government. The world knows more than do we about our own government, but we consider them to be making false accusations and 'against' us, when they tell the truth. They understand that our CIA engages in subversion in other countries and that the military acts in unison for the politico-economical benefits of the corporate few. It's not rocket science to them, but we remain in the rose garden with blinders, much like the German people were at first deceived by Hitler. We have had the issues of Communism vs capitalism presented as a choice and of course we know that capitalism trumps communism by all moral standards, or so we think and we know which side we're on. But do we understand capitalism when it has run amuck due to greed? Do we understand monoply capitalism enforced by government all over the world destroying other governments in many cases in order to increase profits and control of natural resources? Do we understand that there is a big difference between capitalism and the free enterprize system that fostered trade and commerce between individuals and states?
Find me a teenager in government school that can tell the difference in monoply capitalism and free enterprize; they will most likely look blank and have no idea what is the definition of either. It does not behoove those two ideas to be made issues with a choice. Kids cannot be taught to have analytical ability; that questions and discovers facts and facts are truths to be obscured, lest control of the issues becomes lost. Teachers are facillitators leading children to preconceived outcomes in their thinking process and not to encourage them to think for themselves. No wonder we don't think much anymore and just follow in directions led. A couple of generations more and the powers that be won't have to bother with defining issues and manipulating minds via the media, they'll have a society of robotic unquestioning followers just depending upon the next handout.


Someone has said that our biggest problem is that government is no longer "user-friendly." I don't know that they ever were and it may not be our biggest problem, but what a concept; 'user-friendly government. Does that mean our government servants should smile and be accommodating, or is it that our masters should grin when they stick it to us? Of course what we have is the latter. There is more and more an arrogance in those who represent government and we are their peons. On a higher level, why should they have any respect for those who are so ignorant and easily influenced and willingly serve their needs? Besides, they know what is best for the world and what is best for all of us. They see the bigger picture and they think we are too dumb to understand our own needs, so they will provide for us on their terms. Of course that means we work, they take from us and give us back a little, after skimming off the top for their own use. Our government is user-friendly, alright; user-friendly for 'them.'

Americans are followers, following anti-American leaders. We tend to think they are one of us and grovel over every word they utter, depending on who represents what we think are our own ideas. Those leaders of years gone by are still not often recognized for what they were. We honor Communists in our midst, yet no way we could be communists, we think. The government has long had known Communists within its' ranks, appointed by some that many think were true American to the bone. Presidential cabinets have long contained appointed Communists. Presidential advisers have been known Communists and that's just those we know about. Today, we don't think about Communists within our government leadership, but the ideology remains and has incrementally accomplished most of their goals. We were kept diverted to issues that obscured the growth of Communism within our nation. But it never ceased. Why would a non-Communist nation based upon individual freedom, employ and appoint those who embraced an ideology directly opposed to freedom?
Why did we celebrate and honor those like Martin Luther King, whose associates were Communists and who embraced that ideology? Why is Rosa Parks exalted for what she
did because of what she learned at a Communist training school called Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee, a school later closed down by the FBI just for that reason, but was later reopened in Eastern Tennessee? Too many people became aware of what it was and the FBI conveniently allowed it to reopen elsewhere. It was also attended by Andrew Young, Maynard Jackson, Martin Luther King and others. Yet, Andrew Young was eventually appointed an Ambassador to the United Nations. Both he and Maynard had been Atlanta Mayors. Why would a government of free people appoint someone to any position, when that someone was affiliated with an ideology opposed to a free people? We were provided a lot of issues to keep us distracted and we took sides on civil rights issues and states rights, etc. FDR and Bill Clinton were closet communists. Bill Clinton's good friend and early on advisor was Derek Shearer who had Communist associations and wrote a book for his comrades advising them that the "S-Word" was not acceptable to the American people and he advised using the term "Economic Democracy" to replace and he wrote a book by that title. The "S-Word" to which he referred was 'socialism.' Tom Hayden consorted within that clique as did other 'leftists' who were nothing but Communists. We have appointed Communists and we have elected Communists, and we name streets after Communists and we provide all sorts of honorary for that ilk; we see the Communist Manifesto implemented in almost every aspect within our nation from schools to currency control and they're working on banning weapons, yet we don't see Communism within our own midst? Why would we join and largely support on our own shores a world wide Communist organization like the United Nations, an organization founded by Communists? Why would we share our military 'secrets' with such an organization that undermined our forces such as it did MacArthur in Korea? Why was MacArthur forced to serve under the United Nations? Why did Clinton allow the Chinese Communists to have access to our technology? We have a long history of supporting Communist regimes, while pretending to fight them. Communism is its' own conspiracy, invented by those who had a worldview beneficial to themselves and an ideology unlike what most would envision. McCarthy was maligned for what truth he spoke exposing those who were Communists in government and in the media. We were diverted to the issue of Communist vs Capitalist while Fascism was being implemented using the methods of both. We have always been divided by issues and issues were used to manipulate our thinking and accomplish what amounts to mind control. We no longer recognize communism by any other name or by its ideology, nor by it's promoters. We have been neutralized and deceived by issues that encompassed subversion, diversion, and distraction fostered by government and an agenda we seem unable to recognize and combat. Communism and Capitalism as a thesis and anti-thesis will become the synthesis in a fascist, socialsitic, totalitarian society in a new world order.

Churches have little meat, but plenty of candy. They influence you to take a side on issues, yet never telling the real Truth. Oh they think they do so, with their distorted gospel and sweet rhetoric for soothing consciences. Few would attend churches if they left feeling guilty and not feeling good about themselves. That's why the Remnant is said to be so few; they aren't many found in today's compromised state incorporated churches. Being Christian is not taught in church the Way that was taught by Jesus Christ. That would be so unpopular that the church would become mostly vacant. Church-ligion has nothing to do with the Truth taught by Jesus Christ. Teaching a gospel of 'Salvation made Easy' for one and all, with little regard for repentance, nor the Biblical requirements for a christian life that follows His Teachings, and with emphasis upon entertainment and fellowships, the hardships and persecution promised by Jesus Christ are largely obscured or ignored. There has always been a Remnant and there always will be, and it is those "who are saved" who 'endureth until the end.' I believe in works and I believe it is a responsibility of His Church to show their Faith thru their works, but it is not works that attain salvation. Neither is it works alone that exemplify Christian living. Today's Christian should be listening to Paul's message to the Galations, when he told them that many of them would not enter the 'narrow gate.' Paul was speaking to the Israelites (Christians), when he plainly tells them that many (of them) will hear His Words of "Depart from me." Let a pastor tell his 'christian' congregration that many of them will hear that! You see, the Truth is often avoided in the pulpit. Omission of that which is not comfortably received is the standard practice in most churches of today.

The churches of today, regardless of 'religious' denomination are largely compromised and filled with the world. Long ago, they opted for numbers and majestic structures as a priority over strong and sound doctrine and Truth. Often operated as the state corporation that they are, we see their marketing geared to the world of pleasure seekers in order to increase their membership numbers. Their growth game is outcome-based and spiritual maturity is not a part of that growth pattern. These congregations would not listen to a 'Paul' tell them that most of them are going to Hell. Like Satan, they too believe, but they know not His Salvation. They are the Israelites to which Paul referred, deceived about their own Salvation. The Remnant are few. According to Webster, it means "rare," "remaining," "leftover," "very few," "remainder," "trace." The Remnant are those few of the many who profess to be Christian. They are the true believers and followers, His Elect, His Chosen, who He Foreknew. They are the ones about whom it was said, "trembled at His Truth." The varied church-ligions have their own ideas about 'trembling' and some rock and roll, holler and shout and sway, claiming to be 'afflicted' by the Holy Spirit. I do not judge what is in their hearts for only God doeth Know, but I do know that speaking in tongues has more to do with demons than it does anything Godly, and that 'trembling at His Word,' is not necessarily outwardly shown. The Remnant are more likely to be in their prayer closet doing their trembling, and not in a public forum. Every Christian should seek an understanding of what Paul writes to the churches and do so with an open mind. Too many who do read his 'preaching,' do not search their own hearts and realize that he is addressing them just as he is addressing the Israelites (Christians), in their churches. No minister has ever been so bold and courageous and forthright while teaching Christians the Word of God, as has Paul. His messages are directed to Christians for Christians and undoubtedly, exactly as God directed they be given. Therefore, should we not pay serious heed? Only the Remnant will be saved, a remnant, (small number), out of the many who claim, (think they are), Christians. And that is why I tremble at the Word of God with His Truth. That is why I fear God. That is why I seek His Will. That is why I cannot allow myself diverted and divided by the opinions and issues of men. My focus is not on the mundane issues of this world. That does not mean that I ignore what goes on around me for I know that I am to be watchful of the signs and know the enemy in order to be prepared and to help others be prepared. I know that Satan works in secret and darkness but the Truth of His Light exposes all for all to see who have the eyes to see. When you see Christians focusing on party politics and issues involving the current events and being mind manipulated by media and government, and even church, you can probably assume they are not a part of the Remnant. When you see Christians supporting one side or another in some socialistic scheme emanating from government, you can probably assume they are not a part of the few who are His Remnant. If you see Christians that ignore the atrocities committed by government, or who just simply remain in ignorance of them, you are probably not seeing someone that is a part of the Remnant. What part of "study to show thyself approved" don't they understand? While works may produce good fruits, if that is not accompanied by a spirituality that supercedes the enticements of the flesh, the Remnant does not include them. If Christians are submitting to an antichrist system, bowing to another master, or are embracing unsound doctrines within their incorporated churches, they are not likely to be a part of the Remnant. These may seem like harsh words, but the gate is narrow, indeed. Paul was certainly not one to mince words, and he is much too harsh for the average Christian to fully digest.

Churches are misleading Christians about a mulitude of things from 'being saved from the rapture' and not having to endure unto the end, to the deceit that is nation Israel and just who are the Israelites of today. Of course, there is much more false teaching by some denominations, such as baptismal salvation, salvation by works, living by a pick and choose digest of Sriptures from the Old Testament and the Old Covenant, and ignoring the New Testament and the New Covenant, and following man's teaching and man's traditions and on and on. We must discern for ourselves thru our own study if we are to understand our place on this earth in relation to what God would have it be. The only people who will escape this life, Satan's world, "alive" (in Him), are those who are the Remnant. Feel good sermons and entertaining services and social fellowships haven't done much to combat Satan's world and its' evilness. In fact, I'm convinced that most churches are tools of Satan's deceit. As is Said, things worsen; "wax worse," and this in spite of towering steeples on every corner and dotting the countrysides in so-called Christian America. The best of intentions is not an armor against deceit. Here again, no one is asking the right questions. Dare not speak the truth if it seems unkind to Jews for anti-semitism is used to evade such truth. Why aren't we asking, "Who really are the Jews?" Who are the Israelites? Who are the Pharisees of today? What is Zionism really all about? Why are Masons even allowed within churches or holding elected office when their own oaths of allegiance not only conflict with God's Word but also recognize another master, and supercede any oath of office? The Remnant will ask these questions and they will not be liked by other Christians because of it. If these are issues to confront, then such as these are the issues being faced by the Remnant. The Remnant cannot remain where associations are vile and without His Light. Darkness cannot exist where the Remnant remain and they will be driven away either by their own choice following His Teaching, or they will be cast out by the darkness that cannot stand light.

A day will come when sides will be taken and on that day we will choose not on issues, but to whom we serve. That day has already come and gone for many. It is faced everyday by the christian, but only the Remnant have chosen, just as they have been chosen, to stand apart from man's traditions and Satan's world and endure until the end. Only they have asked the right questions; only they have stood firm, bold, and couraegous in the face of persecution. Only they have defied the antichrist government and refused to submit. They have never accepted another master, never looked to government for their needs. They know that God did not ordain the masonic antichrist pharisee fake Christian government that has been protrayed to us as our Christian heritage. Just think how few those must be and tremble.